Difference between a Structure and a Union in C

With a union, you’re only supposed to use one of the elements, because they’re all stored at the same spot. This makes it useful when you want to store something that could be one of several types. A struct, on the other hand, has a separate memory location for each of its elements and they all can be used at once.

To give a concrete example of their use, I was working on a Scheme interpreter a little while ago and I was essentially overlaying the Scheme data types onto the C data types. This involved storing in a struct an enum indicating the type of value and a union to store that value.

union foo {
  int a;   // can't use both a and b at once
  char b;
} foo;

struct bar {
  int a;   // can use both a and b simultaneously
  char b;
} bar;

union foo x;
x.a = 3; // OK
x.b = 'c'; // NO! this affects the value of x.a!

struct bar y;
y.a = 3; // OK
y.b = 'c'; // OK

edit: If you’re wondering what setting x.b to ‘c’ changes the value of x.a to, technically speaking it’s undefined. On most modern machines a char is 1 byte and an int is 4 bytes, so giving x.b the value ‘c’ also gives the first byte of x.a that same value:

union foo x;
x.a = 3;
x.b = 'c';
printf("%i, %i\n", x.a, x.b);


99, 99

Why are the two values the same? Because the last 3 bytes of the int 3 are all zero, so it’s also read as 99. If we put in a larger number for x.a, you’ll see that this is not always the case:

union foo x;
x.a = 387439;
x.b = 'c';
printf("%i, %i\n", x.a, x.b);


387427, 99

To get a closer look at the actual memory values, let’s set and print out the values in hex:

union foo x;
x.a = 0xDEADBEEF;
x.b = 0x22;
printf("%x, %x\n", x.a, x.b);


deadbe22, 22

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s